The fact that three prosecutors of the investigation had been unaware of the documents of an investigation into a massacre which claimed the lives of 100 people for four years constitutes - to say the least - the offense of misconduct in office. No prosecutor has the judicial authority to 'hide' a file. The complaint is about the fact that the investigation documents consisting of nine folders are not among the evidence at all. The complaint is also not about the physical absence of the investigation documents that were among the evidence collected during the investigation. "The complaint is not about how the evidence added to the file was evaluated by the prosecutor's office. The Lawyers' Commission of the October 10 Ankara Massacre have indicated that it was not possible for the Court of Cassation's 1st Chamber to not understand the subject of their complaints: "The proceedings of complaint against prosecutor Derda Gökmen are still pending before the Board of Judges and Prosecutors (HSK)." 'Prosecutors don't have such an authority' "With its decision dated October 25, 2020, the Court of Cassation's 1st Board of Presidents have decided to quash the file against prosecutors Ramazan Dinç and Tekin Küçük on the grounds that 'the content of the complaint was related to an issue stemming from the exercise of judicial power and that the content of the allegations was abstract.' "The complaints filed against prosecutors Ramazan Dinç and Tekin Küçük were sent by the HSK to the 1st Board of Presidents of the Court of Cassation on the grounds that they were still on duty. "This situation was raised during the ongoing trial we applied to to the Board of Judges and Prosecutors (HSK) on and filed a complaint against three investigation prosecutors Ramazan Dinç, Tekin Küçük and Derda Gökmen, who committed a crime by hiding the evidence. "After the investigation files consisting of nine folders were submitted to the Ankara 4th High Criminal Court on October 16, 2019, which was four years after the massacre and 14 months after the conclusion of the first court case, it was revealed that the prosecutors of the October 10 Ankara Massacre hid the evidence that would enable the massacre to be solved. The lawyers have shared the following information: Allegations found to have 'abstract content' ![]() The 1st Board of Presidents of the Court of Cassation previously decided to quash the investigation file against prosecutors Ramazan Dinç and Tekin Küçük, who were investigating the Ankara Massacre. ![]() The Lawyers' Commission of the October 10 Ankara Massacre Case have announced that they made an individual application to the Constitutional Court today (November 26) and appealed against the decision of the Court of Cassation's 1st Board of Presidents.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |